主题：南京大屠杀是不存在的
回复：南京大屠杀是不存在的
『増補 南京事件論争史: 日本人は史実をどう認識してきたか (平凡社ライブラリー)』平凡社、2018年12月12日、919,995,1633頁。
笠原十九司は、南京事件について責任があるのは、武藤章、松井石根、朝香宮鳩彦（鳩彦王）、柳川平助としている[24]。
东京审判中，因南京大屠杀而判罪（绞刑）的只有一人——乙级战犯松井石根。
但是攻打南京的时候，松井石根因病在苏州，并未在南京一线指挥。当时在南京一线指挥的，就是这个“朝香宫鸠彦王”——他刚刚接替生病的松井石根，出任“上海派遣军司令”。此人亲自签署了“杀掉全部俘获人员”的命令。有学者认为：这个命令是造成南京大屠杀的直接原因。
那为啥是“松井石根”替“朝香宫鸠彦王”顶罪捏？因为盟军在战后追查战犯罪行时，有一条限制：不追究日本皇室成员。
In November 1937, Prince Asaka became temporary commander of the Japanese forces outside Nanjing, then capital of China, because General Matsui was ill. As temporary commander of the final assault on Nanjing between 2 and 6 December 1937, he issued the order to "kill all captives", thus providing official sanction for what became known as the "Nanjing Massacre" or the "Rape of Nanjing" (12 December 1937 – 10 February 1938).[2]（ Chen, World War II Database）
Immunity from prosecution
Edit
Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP) officials interrogated Prince Asaka about his involvement in the Nanjing Massacre on 1 May 1946, but did not bring him before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East for prosecution. Indeed, for politico-strategic and geopolitical reasons, General Douglas MacArthur decided to support the Imperial family and to grant immunity to all its members. Matsui, on the other hand, was tried, convicted, and executed for failing to prevent the massacre.[4]
找了些资料证明南京事件是存在的，如果不存在我们怎么开“南京大刺身”的玩笑？
笠原十九司は、南京事件について責任があるのは、武藤章、松井石根、朝香宮鳩彦（鳩彦王）、柳川平助としている[24]。
东京审判中，因南京大屠杀而判罪（绞刑）的只有一人——乙级战犯松井石根。
但是攻打南京的时候，松井石根因病在苏州，并未在南京一线指挥。当时在南京一线指挥的，就是这个“朝香宫鸠彦王”——他刚刚接替生病的松井石根，出任“上海派遣军司令”。此人亲自签署了“杀掉全部俘获人员”的命令。有学者认为：这个命令是造成南京大屠杀的直接原因。
那为啥是“松井石根”替“朝香宫鸠彦王”顶罪捏？因为盟军在战后追查战犯罪行时，有一条限制：不追究日本皇室成员。
In November 1937, Prince Asaka became temporary commander of the Japanese forces outside Nanjing, then capital of China, because General Matsui was ill. As temporary commander of the final assault on Nanjing between 2 and 6 December 1937, he issued the order to "kill all captives", thus providing official sanction for what became known as the "Nanjing Massacre" or the "Rape of Nanjing" (12 December 1937 – 10 February 1938).[2]（ Chen, World War II Database）
Immunity from prosecution
Edit
Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP) officials interrogated Prince Asaka about his involvement in the Nanjing Massacre on 1 May 1946, but did not bring him before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East for prosecution. Indeed, for politico-strategic and geopolitical reasons, General Douglas MacArthur decided to support the Imperial family and to grant immunity to all its members. Matsui, on the other hand, was tried, convicted, and executed for failing to prevent the massacre.[4]
找了些资料证明南京事件是存在的，如果不存在我们怎么开“南京大刺身”的玩笑？
sllnvaeolbz800 23-03-07
